This blog post is dedicated to introducing the second of the eight prayer texts I am working with. This one is titled "Furious God" and was used by the speaker to approach their personal gods with both an entreaty for forgiveness and an admittance of guilt.
The Mesopotamian prayers I have been studying range in the emotion they portray. Some suggest confidence, some fear. "Furious God" emits feelings of both shame and desperation. The speaker openly begs the gods to replace their anger with kindness:
"May your feelings be soothed, permit be reconciliation,
Let me ever sing your praises, not to be forgotten,
to the numerous peoples"
It almost gives off the impression of an ashamed child begging forgiveness for some wrongdoing from their irate parents.
Interestingly, the prayer never clarifies exactly what exactly the speaker has done wrong other that the vague words:
"I have sworn lightly a solemn oath by your name,
I have disregarded your rites, I went too far"
What this means is not exactly clear. Did the speaker forget to provide their god offerings? Did they vocally disregard their personal god? The possibilities are endless.
However, this vagueness is what differentiates this prayer from the last one I discussed ("Against Any Evil"). While "Against Any Evil" required personalization of the text in order for it to be used, "Furious God" does not even require the names of the personal gods it is intended for. "Furious God" is as general as "Against Any Evil" is specific.
Ancient Near Eastern Signature
Sunday, 10 January 2016
Thursday, 24 December 2015
Picking Your Words Carefully
Akkadian is amazing and nothing like any language I have tried to learn before (which are all Latin-based). Over the past few months my vocabulary has really begun to expand. In fact, to my great excitement, I have found that often authors of the Near Eastern history books I am studying will reference words that I have learnt. I am fascinated by how quickly the language and research components of this project are intertwining.
So here is an interesting tidbit about Akkadian:
Some words can have many translations which range in multiple ideas. For example: 'libbum' can translate as 'heart, mind, thought, wish, inside, center, town center,' and 'midst'.
Libbum is actually a really interesting word. Its ability to translate as 'heart' as well as 'mind, wish,' and 'thought' suggests a lot about what tasks the ancient Near East believed the heart performed.
The translation of libbum as 'center' is also something to pause over. Did the Mesopotamians connect these words because of location (the hearts central location in the body) or because of its significance (the heart as the center for mental activity)?
Translation in any language is tricky work and often I find myself translating an Akkadian sentence incorrectly because of the many options each word allows for. But it is also like putting together a jigsaw; translation is about combining sections to make a logical whole.
And, in the end, when it comes to a sentences like, "I walk to the libbum with my mule", it is fairly obvious that the writer prefers 'town center' over 'thought'.
So here is an interesting tidbit about Akkadian:
Some words can have many translations which range in multiple ideas. For example: 'libbum' can translate as 'heart, mind, thought, wish, inside, center, town center,' and 'midst'.
Libbum is actually a really interesting word. Its ability to translate as 'heart' as well as 'mind, wish,' and 'thought' suggests a lot about what tasks the ancient Near East believed the heart performed.
The translation of libbum as 'center' is also something to pause over. Did the Mesopotamians connect these words because of location (the hearts central location in the body) or because of its significance (the heart as the center for mental activity)?
Translation in any language is tricky work and often I find myself translating an Akkadian sentence incorrectly because of the many options each word allows for. But it is also like putting together a jigsaw; translation is about combining sections to make a logical whole.
And, in the end, when it comes to a sentences like, "I walk to the libbum with my mule", it is fairly obvious that the writer prefers 'town center' over 'thought'.
Thursday, 3 December 2015
Religious Prayer Texts (1 of 8)
I have spent a good amount of time in my past posts discussing the Akkadian side of my project so I have decided to dedicate this post to my research.
One of the really exciting aspects of my project is looking at a range of prayer texts from Mesopotamia (translated into English) and trying to gleam some insight into what they suggest about the relationship between the speaker and the recipient of the prayer.
Today I want to give a brief overview of the one of the eight prayers I am directly working with.
This prayer is called "Against Any Evil" and its purpose was to halt any evil foretold by an unfavorable omen. The speaker directs his plea to three of the most powerful Mesopotamian gods: Ea, Shamash, and Asalluhi (also known as Marduk).
I love this text because it is what I call a "fill-in-the-blank" prayer. A "fill-in-the-blank" prayer is a work in which the majority of the words remain constant but a few lines allow for personalization of the text. Here is an example in "Against Any Evil" of one section that requires adaptation by the speaker:
Wherever there are signs and portents,
as many as there are,
I (insert name of speaker), son of (speaker's father),
Whose (personal) god is (name of god),
Whose (personal) goddess is (name of goddess),
Against whom evil signs keep occurring,
I am afraid, frightened, and terrified!
Mesopotamian prayers range from the extremely personalized to the completely pre-scripted. This will become clear as I post, throughout the year, detailed descriptions of the other texts I am studying according to when I begin to focus on them.
One of the really exciting aspects of my project is looking at a range of prayer texts from Mesopotamia (translated into English) and trying to gleam some insight into what they suggest about the relationship between the speaker and the recipient of the prayer.
Today I want to give a brief overview of the one of the eight prayers I am directly working with.
This prayer is called "Against Any Evil" and its purpose was to halt any evil foretold by an unfavorable omen. The speaker directs his plea to three of the most powerful Mesopotamian gods: Ea, Shamash, and Asalluhi (also known as Marduk).
I love this text because it is what I call a "fill-in-the-blank" prayer. A "fill-in-the-blank" prayer is a work in which the majority of the words remain constant but a few lines allow for personalization of the text. Here is an example in "Against Any Evil" of one section that requires adaptation by the speaker:
Wherever there are signs and portents,
as many as there are,
I (insert name of speaker), son of (speaker's father),
Whose (personal) god is (name of god),
Whose (personal) goddess is (name of goddess),
Against whom evil signs keep occurring,
I am afraid, frightened, and terrified!
Mesopotamian prayers range from the extremely personalized to the completely pre-scripted. This will become clear as I post, throughout the year, detailed descriptions of the other texts I am studying according to when I begin to focus on them.
Saturday, 31 October 2015
Akkadian Sentences
I
have officially begun writing sentences in Akkadian!
Taking
Latin for four years has been an incredible help for learning Akkadian. As I
already learned about genitives and nominatives in Latin, I don't have to spend
any time learning about what they are when they have come up in my Akkadian
textbook. This means that I can quickly focus in on how the grammar is applied
rather than on what the terms actually mean.
I am
going to dissect a simple sentence in Akkadian to show what I have learned so
far:
mārtum ša šarrim šī
mārtum - nominative, singular,
feminine form of "mārtum" (daughter)
ša - determinative pronoun
meaning "of" or "the one of", ša always takes goes
with a genitive
šarrim - genitive, singular, masculine
form of "šarrum" (king), it is genitive because it goes
with ša and is possessive
šī - third person, nominative,
feminine pronoun (she). It is at the end of a sentence because
subjects of verb-less clauses (if they are pronouns) are placed at the end of
the sentence.
Akkadian
has no verb "to be" - a "to be" clause (known as a
verb-less clause) is expressed when you juxtapose the subject and the
predicate.
So the translation of "mārtum ša šarrim šī" is "She is the daughter of the king".
Moving Forward
I purposely devoted the majority of the the past few weeks to my Akkadian studies. However, after getting in contact with my off-campus mentor, the research part of my Signature is finally moving forward.
I am researching the connection between gods and mortals in the ancient Near East. Over the coming months I will study this topic throughly and then dedicate second semester to writing a research paper which will act as a culmination of my findings.
After talking on the phone about my goals, my off-campus mentor, a professor of the ancient Near East, suggested some reading materials that I should use to begin narrowing in on my topic.
These materials include:
Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization by A. Leo Oppenheim
Family Religion in Babylonia, Ugarit and Israel: Continuity and Changes in the Forms of Religious Life by K Van Der Toorn
Ancient Mesopotamian Religion: A Descriptive Introduction by Ivan Hrusa
These are all books, so my plan is to spend the month until Thanksgiving break working through them and taking notes.
I am researching the connection between gods and mortals in the ancient Near East. Over the coming months I will study this topic throughly and then dedicate second semester to writing a research paper which will act as a culmination of my findings.
After talking on the phone about my goals, my off-campus mentor, a professor of the ancient Near East, suggested some reading materials that I should use to begin narrowing in on my topic.
These materials include:
Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization by A. Leo Oppenheim
Family Religion in Babylonia, Ugarit and Israel: Continuity and Changes in the Forms of Religious Life by K Van Der Toorn
Ancient Mesopotamian Religion: A Descriptive Introduction by Ivan Hrusa
These are all books, so my plan is to spend the month until Thanksgiving break working through them and taking notes.
Annotated Bibliography
This is an annotated bibliography of the resources I have used so far this year:
- Huehnergard, John. A Grammar of Akkadian, Third Edition.
Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2011. Print.
This is the book I am using to self-study Akkadian. It is divided
into thirty-eight chapters and each chapter ends with a list of new vocabulary
and multiple exercises can that range from translation to declining nouns to
writing out words in cuneiform.
- Huehnergard, John. Key To A Grammar of Akkadian, Third Edition.
Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2013. Print.
This is the key to the exercises found at the end of each
chapter in A Grammar of Akkadian.
It gives clear answers to the questions, however, it does
not provide any extra clarification or information concerning tricky
translations.
- Finkle, Irving and Jonathan Taylor.
Cuneiform. Los Angles: Getty
Publications, 2015. Print.
This a very recently published book written by Irving Finkle
and Jonathan Taylor, two cuneiform curators at the British Museum (which holds
the largest collection of cuneiform tablets in the world).
It focuses on practical ideas concerning cuneiform by
answering questions such as how it was written, why it died out, and how it was
deciphered by modern historians.
The book supplements my study of Akkadian by allowing me to
develop a greater depth of understanding of the stages cuneiform went through in
order for me to be able to self-study it today.
- Foster, Benjamin R. From Distant Days: Myths, Tales, and Poetry
of Ancient Mesopotamia. Bethesda: CDL Press, 1995. Print.
Foster, a well-known and highly praised Assyriologist, provides
clear translations a vast assortment of ancient Near Eastern texts, ranging
from hymns and prayers to magical spells and humorous stories, in his book. Complete with a full-length introduction and
many explanatory footnotes (both by Foster) his work gives a wealth of
background information that offers clarity for the reader, no matter their
previous knowledge.
Foster also includes snippets of information (ranging in
length from a few sentences to full length paragraphs) for each individual
translation. This information generally covers the background, author (if known),
and purpose of the text and is extremely important information as it gives
specific facts about the seven texts I have chosen to study.
- Van De Mieroop, Marc. A History of the Ancient Near East, ca.
3000-323 BC. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. Print.
Marc Van De Mieroop provides a comprehensive and thought-provoking
description of the ancient Near East as a whole between the years 3000 -323
BCE.
This book is especially important for the research aspect of
my signature as it enhanced my basic knowledge of the ancient Near East which I
will be need in order to provide crucial background details when I start
studying specific texts.
Thursday, 1 October 2015
Tongue-tied
There is something very powerful about speaking out loud words from a language that has not been used for over two thousand years.
The past week has marked the beginning of my journey into the study of Akkadian. Akkadian is an Ancient Near Eastern language which was spoken primarily by the Assyrians, Babylonians, and of course, the Akkadians. It is written in cuneiform (although, I will not begin to write in cuneiform for a number of chapters). The book I am using to self-study is "A Grammar of Akkadian" by John Huehnergard and I have just finished the first section which focuses on pronunciation and syllable recognition.
Since the Akkadian language has been out of use for millennia, it is impossible to know exactly how it was spoken. However, scholars have been able to make educated guesses about pronunciation by making comparisons with other languages such as Arabic, Amharic, and Hebrew. All three carry some relation to Akkadian.
It is remarkably tricky to get my head around pronunciation. Two words can look very similar but, because of a macron or circumflex, can have completely different meanings. This means careful pronunciation is key.
To give an example: "mutum" means husband, but "mūtum" means death. The only difference is that in "mūtum" the u sound is held longer.
Although I am still a complete beginner, I am loving my introduction to Akkadian. In the next chapter I will begin to study noun declension and independent personal pronouns and I am really excited!
The past week has marked the beginning of my journey into the study of Akkadian. Akkadian is an Ancient Near Eastern language which was spoken primarily by the Assyrians, Babylonians, and of course, the Akkadians. It is written in cuneiform (although, I will not begin to write in cuneiform for a number of chapters). The book I am using to self-study is "A Grammar of Akkadian" by John Huehnergard and I have just finished the first section which focuses on pronunciation and syllable recognition.
Since the Akkadian language has been out of use for millennia, it is impossible to know exactly how it was spoken. However, scholars have been able to make educated guesses about pronunciation by making comparisons with other languages such as Arabic, Amharic, and Hebrew. All three carry some relation to Akkadian.
It is remarkably tricky to get my head around pronunciation. Two words can look very similar but, because of a macron or circumflex, can have completely different meanings. This means careful pronunciation is key.
To give an example: "mutum" means husband, but "mūtum" means death. The only difference is that in "mūtum" the u sound is held longer.
Although I am still a complete beginner, I am loving my introduction to Akkadian. In the next chapter I will begin to study noun declension and independent personal pronouns and I am really excited!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)